I'm doing research on MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) right
now. I've only participated in a few, but the concept intrigues me. My focus
areas are instructional design and instructor activity. The literature on MOOCs
is expanding, but much of it centers on individual experience in the MOOC. As
researchers consider individual goals and motivations for participating in
MOOCs, participant profiles begin to emerge. One participant type that was
inevitable – at least in my opinion – is the lurker.
The lurker is present not only in MOOCs, but in any
networked situation both face-to-face and online. You know the lurker. You've
probably been the lurker; I have. In fact, I lurk a lot. I lurked in
face-to-face situations. One time, my sister and I went to the dog track and
decided to lurk to see if we could pick a few winners before actually placing a
bet. We never did get comfortable enough to wager, so we just watched about 17
races. We felt kind of conspicuous after a while. Lurking online is much
easier. Your name shows up on the participant list, but you just never
contribute. Or you have a Twitter account and follow people, but never tweet.
That kind of thing.
So what's the big deal with the lurker? Well, some authors
see lurkers as "free-riders" (Tschofen & Mackness, 2012). In
other words, lurkers take and don't give. Connected learning environments offer
the ability for participants to interact and share knowledge (Mackness, Mak,
& Williams, 2010). Such environments, in fact, rely on individual
contributions and sharing for knowledge creation. According to Siemens (2010),
lurking is never a good thing nor is it ever acceptable. Siemens believes that
even newcomers to a situation should be sharing and helping to create
understanding. He asserts that newcomers may be better positioned than experts to
help other newcomers.
I don’t know about you, but that makes me uncomfortable. The
last thing I want to do is reveal my ignorance in a public forum (although I
wind up doing exactly that all too frequently). I like to look around, get
comfortable, and see what's going on: how smart is everyone else? If they are
too smart – meaning smarter than I am – I may decide just to hang out and
absorb or perhaps leave the forum all together. It's unlikely my exposed
ignorance will add much, and will likely only annoy the smart people. And
online, people are none too shy about informing you of your ignorance,
sometimes rather unpleasantly.
How do you feel? Is it fair to lurk in an open forum? Does everybody
have an obligation to participate? Have you ever been a lurker yourself?
References
Mackness, J., Mak, S., & Williams, R. (2010). The ideals
and reality of participating in a MOOC. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson,
C. Jones, M. de Laat, D. McConnell, & T Ryberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning
2010. University of Lancaster, Lancaster (pp. 266-275). ISBN 9781862202252
Siemens, G. (2010, December 1). My personal learning network is the most awesome thing ever [Web
log post]. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2010/12/01/my-personal-learning-network-is-the-most-awesomest-thing-ever/
Tschofen, C., & Mackness, J. (2012). Connectivism and
dimensions of individual experience. The International Review of Research in Open
and Distance Learning, 13(1), 124-143.
No comments:
Post a Comment