In my work with online instructors, I keep hearing a lot of
talk about using wikis and blogs "as they are intended to be used" or
"they way they should be used." By that, the individuals are
referring to the way we generally think about wikis and blogs: a wiki is a
collaborative web space with potentially multiple contributors, and a blog is
an individual journal-type site generally maintained by a single entity and
facilitated as an ongoing conversation with readers.
These concepts have merit, but I've begun to wonder if we
are restricting instructors, learners, and the knowledge-building process by
trying to define these spaces. In fact, I'm beginning to wonder if we should
allow learners to make their own choices about which spaces to use rather than
prescribing which space learners should use for an activity. Even if learners
make the "wrong" choice (i.e., using a blog when the instructor
believes a wiki would have been more appropriate), it would still present a
learning opportunity (Parry, 2012). Perhaps it would even allow for the
emergence of innovative uses for these spaces.
Of course, in a "traditional" online classroom,
allowing such choice presents challenges for evaluation and grading. What is
more important: demonstrating mastery of concepts or choosing the appropriate
media for presentation? How do you evaluate mastery of concepts when various
media are used for the same activity? Maybe allowing a more open forum for
learners to demonstrate mastery will, by necessity, require a more open
evaluation process. Now, I know that sounds blasphemous in light of all the
work that has been done over the past century (nearly) to develop reliable
methods of assessment. But an open evaluation process does not have to mean
subjective, invalid, or unreliable. It means we have to rethink the evaluation
criteria we establish and how we measure it.
I don't consider myself a particularly creative person. But
I do know that when I've been challenged with having to make something work
with limited or restricted resources, I've been able to find ways to exploit
whatever technology I had available. Maybe that is the challenge we need to
present to our learners. Instead of prescribing what tool to use, give them a
task and allow them to leverage the tools available. Make the environment more
open. While some learners might prefer more structure, others will run with the
autonomy. In doing so, they may be able to aid or inspire the more reluctant learner.
This shifts the paradigm of the learning environment from one of knowledge
transmission to knowledge production, possibly improving the
"stickiness" of the learning.
Thoughts? Is it our responsibility to direct learners to use
technology "appropriately" or are we better off designing an open and
autonomous environment that encourages exploration, collaboration, and
knowledge construction? If so, how do we adapt assessment methods for the open
environment?
Reference
Parry, M. (2012, March 7). Could many universities follow
Borders Bookstores into oblivion? The
Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from
http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/could-many-universities-follow-borders-bookstores-into-oblivion/35711
Rubrics should be created around competencies that can be measured at different levels regardless of the media used.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely agree with you, Brenda. So many educators are not well prepared to create rubrics like that. It would certain help shift more of the focus onto mastery of concepts than the method of transmission.
ReplyDelete